THEME BY MARAUDERSMAPS
you have reached the journal of while-my-tardis-gently-weeps.

my current fandoms: harry potter, doctor who, the beatles, monty python, les miserables
my first doctor: tenth
my favorite doctors: second, fourth, fifth, tenth
my favorite companion: jamie mccrimmon, sarah jane smith, romana, donna noble
my favorite beatle: george harrison
my favorite python: eric idle

RAVENCLAW: NETTLECHARM99
{ POTTERMORE SORTED }

about me 

dooweeooh:

SYLVESTER CAREFUL

35,094 notes on Sep 18, 2014Via / Source

marchqueen:

gigglewhatsit:

runyouclevertimelord:

dryadgurrl:

himapapaftw:

finally, it has appeared on my dash

Well that was unexpected.

I was not expecting this

no one ever does

212,774 notes on Sep 18, 2014Via / Source

lovelyjaneasher:

2005, March 16th - Caspar Zafer, Jane Asher, Gian Carlo Giannini, director Vicente Aranda, Ether Nubiola, Ingrid Rubio, Victoria Abril and Rafael Amargo and Rafael Amargo during ‘Tirant lo Blanc’ Madrid Photocall at Ritz Hotel in Madrid, Spain.

Photos by Lalo Yasky/Wireimage, Carlos Álvarez/Getty Images

6 notes on Sep 18, 2014Via / Source

lgbtqblogs:

The body tasked with rating films for screening in the United States has given a film about an aging gay couple and their extended families an R-rating in a sign that the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) may itself have fallen behind community standards.

The MPAA gave Love Is Strange, starring John Lithgow and Alfred Molina as a couple who have been together for four decades but who are forced to move in with their families, the rating supposedly for ‘language’ used in the film – though many are saying the decision is just plain homophobic.

There are no nude scenes in Love Is Strange, no drug use, and no sex scenes. The raciest the film gets is two scenes where Molina and Lithgow are asleep in the same bed while fully clothed.

The MPAA has been called out over the issue by New Jersey Star-Ledger film reviewer Stephen Whitty who noted two other films released this month that got the same rating.

‘On Friday, “Sin City: A Dame to Kill For” will be released in a wide number of theaters. It features nudity, sexual situations and substance abuse,’ Whitty wrote in a column posted online yesterday.

‘Every woman in it is a stripper, a prostitute or a murderer. There is violence and graphic gore, including one scene of a man having his eye plucked out and another of a man having his fingers broken with a pliers. It is rated R.

‘That day, “Jersey Shore Massacre” also reaches theaters. It features nudity, sexual situations, substance abuse and ethnic and racial slurs. There is violence and graphic gore, including one scene of a woman being disemboweled, another of a naked woman getting her breasts sliced open and one of a man having his hands fed into a wood chipper. It is rated R.’

‘If there’s an equivalence among these three films, and their equal unsuitability for anyone under 17, it’s lost on me — and, I suspect, on anyone but the censors at the MPAA.’

Whitty said it would be unthinkable that the film would have been given an R-rating had it starred veteran actors Robert Duval and Jane Fonda as an aging straight couple in the same situation.

‘This is a gentle, if often heartbreaking story about two loving men in a long-time committed relationship,’ Whitty wrote, ‘What on earth is in it that so horrifies the MPAA? I’m sorry. I think I just answered my own question.’

Under the MPAA rating system an R-rating implies that a film ‘contains some adult material [and] parents are urged to learn more about the film before taking their young children with them.

5,292 notes on Sep 17, 2014Via / Source

thebeatlesordie:

  • "One of my great memories from John is from when we were having some argument. I was disagreeing and we were calling each other names. We let it settle for a second and then he lowered his glasses and he said, ‘It’s only me…’ and then he put his glasses back on again. To me, that was John." -Paul
  • "We were each other’s intimates." -Paul, The Beatles: A Biography
  • "Paul and I know each other on a lot of different levels that very few people know about." -John
  • Q Magazine - 1998 
    Q: "If John Lennon could come back for a day, how would you spend it with him?"
    Paul: “In bed.”
  • "I have had two companions in my life. Paul McCartney and Yoko Ono. That’s not bad" –John
  • Interview of 1975 for Hit parader
    Q: "Yeah, your friends…"
    John: "Yes, all your best friends let you know what’s going on. I was trying to put it ‘round that I was gay, you know— I thought that would throw them off… dancing at all the gay clubs in Los Angeles, flirting with the boys… but it never got off the ground."
    Q: "I think I’ve only heard that lately about Paul."
    John: “Oh, I’ve had him, he’s no good.”
    (laughter) 
  • John talking about when Paul first joined The Quarry Men: "But he was good, he was worth having. He looked like Elvis. I dug him."
  • “Whatever bad things John said about me, he would also slip his glasses down to the end of his nose and say, ’I love you’. That’s really what I hold on to. That’s what I believe. The rest is showing off.” -Paul
  •  "A song by an old estranged fiancee of mine called Paul" -John speaking of “I Saw Her Standing There”
  • "She (Yoko) recalls hearing people in the Apple office who called McCartney ‘John’s Princess.’" -Unknown (Cant find who said this but it was someone who worked at Apple)
  • "One time Paul had a chick in bed and John came in and got a pair of scissors and cut all her clothes into pieces calling her a whore and what not. He got like that occassionaly."-George
  • "I just saw a girl who said she saw John Lennon walking down the street in New York wearing a button that said, "I love Paul." she asked him, "Why are you wearing an ‘I love Paul’ button?" and he said, "Because I love Paul."-Harry Nillson
  • "He was always saying, ‘I wonder what Paul is doing.’ When John and I were together, and this is about a week or two before our relationship ended, I remember him saying, ‘Do you think I should write with Paul again?’ I said, ‘Absolutely. You should because you want to. The two of you as solo performers are good, but together you can’t be beaten." -May Pang
  • "We were recording the other night, and I just wasn’t there. Neither was Paul. We were like two robots going through the motions. We do need each other alot. When we used to get together after a month off, we used to be embarrassed about touching each other. We’d do an elaborate handshake just to hide the embarrassment… or we did mad dances. Then we got to hugging each other." -John

Im just saying if they aren’t your OTP they should at least be your BROTP because hell they loved each other SO fucking much and that is obvious. Even after the break-up of the Beatles when they both were so stubborn and angry with each other they still cared for each other so much. Their friendship is golden and a beautiful, beautiful thing. 

image

640 notes on Sep 17, 2014Via / Source
897 notes on Sep 17, 2014Via / Source
"

… “You must have shown me real loyalty down in the Chamber. Nothing but that could’ve called Fawkes to you.” That’s the very first thing Dumbledore thanks and praises Harry for. Not for rescuing Ginny, or saving the school from the basilisk, or for keeping Voldemort from coming back, but for loyalty.

Dumbledore judges the people he works with based first and foremost on how loyal they are to him. Not because he thinks he’s all that, but because, as I said, he views people as game pieces, and you can’t have your game pieces acting up, can you? He values his pieces. He wants to advance and protect them. But he doesn’t want them running off beyond his sphere of influence and doing their own thing. I think there’s something very ambiguous about Dumbledore’s habit of seeking out desperate, socially outcast people and doing them one or two huge favors that leave them bound to him for life. Remus, Hagrid and Snape all fit that pattern, and Trelawney and Firenze appear to join the ranks in OOP. It kind of makes me wonder what Dumbledore has done for Fletcher, Moody and Shacklebolt.

…The problem with Sirius is, he’s not loyal to Dumbledore at all; he’s loyal to Harry. From Dumbledore’s point of view, it’s as if he’s playing wizard chess, and one of the knights suddenly decides that he doesn’t care what happens to the king, he’s just going to take care of that little pawn on the left. So Dumbledore does the only thing he thinks he can do — he sticks his recalcitrant knight into a safe, isolated corner of the board and keeps him from making any moves. Perfectly sensible and strategically sound, as long as you don’t expect your game pieces to have any pesky emotions or psychological issue that need to be taken into account.

…Dumbledore’s actions at Hogwarts are another symptom of his general approach. He doesn’t treat it just as a school, but also as an instrument in his strategy. People like Snape, Hagrid and Trelawny — all lousy teachers, in very different ways — are given their jobs as perks, because of their past of future usefulness to the Order, and because it strengthens their bonds of loyalty to Dumbledore.

OTOH, look at Lupin, who is a talented teacher. Why wasn’t he hired before Harry’s third year, especially given the difficulty of finding qualified DADA professors? My theory is that Dumbledore didn’t consider it necessary. As far as he knew, Lupin was already totally loyal simply because Dumbledore had allowed him to attend Hogwarts. There was no need to bribe him with a job. He was hired only when his familiarity with Sirius became an important factor. Once Sirius proved not to be a threat, Lupin was allowed to resign…

"
8,205 notes on Sep 17, 2014Via / Source